Lucas – A Question For David Wilcock In The Matter Of The Drake Interview – 8 April 2012

Mr. Wilcock,

I have been leaving a comment on your page as well as I have commented on Tim Turners page about your interview with “Drake”. The anonymous man.

I had been given the impression that this Drake was the man behind the Republic which he was not. He has left the Republic of USA group short RUSA. He and his group had some differences or insights or personal matters going on.  I have always had great respect for your investigations and research mister Wilcock and bought your books. I never had reason to ask a question till now.

Except I get not through to you to get it answered. The question is not posted in the comment section of yours where I have put it for review yesterday. As I think it is too important to leave out I ask it here as an open question to you.

I had been listening to your interview with Drake and was very positive till I got to hear the other side of the story from the round table call with  Tim Turner, President of the Republic and also guests where Ron van Dyke and others. Ron also made a video on this Drake story and Tim Turner : link to video Ron Van Dyke.

I was very disappointed and felt not well-informed after hearing the story from Tim Turner. I think it is not fair nor even right to have just one side of the story told now. As it is much to important to hear what Drake has to say about accusation towards Tim Turner and Tim turner given a change to defend himself as asked in an interview.  If this is not done there is likely to be division amongst the ranks as it is now propagated by your interview bringing  forward Drake in this big way.

I think that this is not beneficial to all. We need not division but unity. And therefore I do not understand what this full-blown story about  Drake, the anonymous one, and his group is about as the other side is not given a proper change to reply or give their side of the story. I may be wrong in asking the question and you have already taken action to give TimTurner and his group a change to tell their side of the story.

Mr. Wilcock will you give Tim Turner a change to reply in an  interview or  will you give  Tim Turner and  Drake together the chance to express their  opinions and maybe resolve their differences and or help to clarify what position you,  mr. Wilcock take in this matter as it now seems to be rivalling groups wanting to re-instate the constitution and republic?

As a Dutch citizen I have nothing to do with or am associated with one of these persons or their groups.  I merely have been following all and in the position of writer of my blog of alternative news.  I want no misunderstanding and loose ends in such important matters as the new Republic has to build on the real Constitution of the USA the proper way.

Looking forward to an answer mister Wilcock.

Love and light,


( note: there is a comment posted on David Wilcock’s blog with name lucas and posted 8 April 2012 that isn’t mine. Mine has not been posted at this moment : 9 April 2012 )

9 responses to “Lucas – A Question For David Wilcock In The Matter Of The Drake Interview – 8 April 2012

  1. Thank you, Lucas. To me, this is a measure of David’s integrity and credibility; and I have always supported him. Will he allow for the other side in this matter to state it’s side is of prime importance.

  2. Wow, Lucas. Thanks for sharing this information. Blessings, ~Gillian

  3. its always good to have 2 sides of a story….this allows for discernment

  4. Having the two together in a confrontational interview would not be healthy for the entire project. No one should approach David Wilcock with demands on how he should handle his work. He is not our servant. I am sure that if this person contacted David in supportive way David would, behind the scenes listen to his story. After all, Drake contacted him and David took the time to listen to him and it turned out well. And I support David in that move. It took me awhile to get past Drake’s way of speaking but then realized that he is full of information and is well educated in the constitution and laws. However after listening to the woman who speaks on his program and how she speaks when she addresses the public is quite revolting. She attacks the american people and ‘tells them off’ ‘ in her manner of speaking. Real bad. Let David make his decisions listening to his inner voice. He is always open for data and information, but not confrontations from those who fight. Emma Sue Buchanan

    • Im not about confrontation but about information. If David has an interview and knows that there is already a dispute going than he has a responsibility in this. I did not know of a dispute or difference of opinion about the so-called factions till I was presented with an other side to the story by chance. I got to hear about Tim Turner and the RUSA organisation. As I listened to this Roundtable Call I was presented with other information that made me think. So that is where my questions to David originate.
      I am nobodies servant. I have not qualified persons voices or whatever. I just mentioned my concerns about not hearing the two sides of an story from an investigating and credible author, I think David still is. I have therefore also put my question to him if this was intentional and therefore a choice of David. I will not answer anymore comments on this matter except for David Wilcock’s response.

      I already got threats via comments and e-mail because of a honest question to David. That says to me people are not ready to see my question for what it is and feel attacked. I just want people that it concerns (and that are the people of this world and certainly the USA) to be informed. If you have an other opinion on things David say what your opinion is. I have concerns about Unity and see division. If that is not cleared I think a lot of us do not know what to think or believe. As for me I am confused now who to follow in this mattter about re-instating the Constitution and bringing forward a new Republic.

      Love and Light,

  5. Lucas,
    You are justified in your position.
    Will I am

  6. thank you for this appeal, lucas…

    many people follow davids work and pour their thoughts and feelings into it. as a reliable researcher and writer he is probably well aware of his responsablity, hence i imagine his search for truth will guide him to view different facettes and hear various voices.

    i trust in davids capacity to discern and balance the information and follow his heart for a bigger clearer picture for all of us to see…

    • I am sorry to say Devapriya, I will not have anyone discern for me. I discern what or if I can resonate with the information and I discern to find the information sufficient or not. I think a classical mistake is to think others will do the right things for you and do the things also for your good at all times and believing so. David can also make mistakes or have other interests that are not in line with what I think or see as true. It is not about trust or believe it is about giving the information to let people decide for themselves. Nobody makes decisions for me or on my behalf anymore without my consent. As said already I see him as a formidable investigative author and applaud him for his work, but that makes David not a saint and always right. I do not trust or believe blindly, I read, see and hear also what information is more about to make a well found opinion on things, Devaprivya. I miss some information to make the story a whole story that is what I have said. I hope this will be corrected.

      Love and light

  7. lucas, dear, i didnt express a belief that david would choose the “right” information” for me to make up my mind. i dont have anyone think, discern or decide for me. not even to galactics, not even to archangels i would try to hand over this freedom and responsablility of mine.

    i expressed my trust, that david will be guided to ponder all valid information, and present to others, which truth he finds in it.

    thus its not meant as a consoling “don’t worry, he’ll do it right”. its more of a “david, i trust that you work for ONE BEING, so you will deal with it in a balanced way and not allow essentials to be suppressed and have differences spoil any thing”.

    something like an appeal to his inner guidance^^, mixed with a projection of a beneficial outcome.

    for sure you are right – there’s no more time to hang on any differences that devide us, but to look for similarities that unite us…and to leave dear little ego-mind at the door when doing the work… 😉

    light, love, laughter…