I wanted to have heard in David Wilcock’s interview with Drake also the side of Tim Turner. That never happened. I was also not allowed to make a comment on the site of David about the question about fair reporting. Giving both sides a change to explain. David answered in an short e-mail. It was not answered just waved away under the motto, that the “Tim Turner” and Group never would answer on the accusations. That it is a wrong and very unfair statement to put accusations out that not can be proved with facts and evidence to check for everyone. It seems we are in a wrongly formulated trial. Everybody is still innocent till proven guilty. Hear say and a bunch of e-mails sent between some people are no proof or not enough proof. I would have been silent David and Drake if you can not proof things with substantiated evidence that would stand in court. The Drake site is now with Terri Hinckle at the frontline busy to put messages out to discredit Tim Turner and Rusa in the “Rusa Exposed” series. I think this is a unworthy way to express things. I says you are not willing to stay by facts and or real evidence. Tim Turner had made clear that he would be delighted to have an interview with David Wilcock and then tell the other side of the now one-sided story. Other things could be brought also to the light and things cleared. An interview is never held. David made clear he has chosen for Drake. You never can say again you are not partial or neutral investigative reporter or author if you only tell the convenient truth from one side.
I am sorry to say that I have problems with the 3 sides of this whole story. Better said act on stage. As David Wilcock as the playwriter and Drake and Turner as the opposite characters. The writer has given Drake the seemingly good character and Turner the bad one. The real story is diffused.
I have problems with the side of Drake as openness and honesty does not mean you give a way strategic or operational information. But keeping all veiled in secrecy as a convenient hide away place is not being open and transparent. I think if you are the one you say Drake, you will be good protected. There are many more citizens and others also not in your group Drake that have been given their lives for freedom. Communication is not possible at present. The side of those who want to be informed in all things right and balanced to make a own “free will”decision are not given their information. That information is even denied. I received nasty e-mails even threats, because I just asked David Wilcock to be balanced in the story and to give both sides of the story. I asked for proof with evidence if you have accusations. Do not ask the accused to proof the accusations to be wrong. That is primitive thinking. It is things turned around. I am a bit put of by the hate campaigns and other stuff I read out there and now see spread around in you tube videos and on http://www.freedomreigns.us. Is that necessary. Just get things straight and be correct and do not do what you others accuse of.
Tim Turner’s Round Table Calls I also have listened to. I have not heard anything to discredit Drake, except in some things an other opinion on things but that is normal. What I hear also is that “The Republic” will be build on Judeo-Christian principles besides common law. I have already questioned this as that would mean Rusa is a theocracy. It says to me that non-believers, people who do not live their lives as the Bible or the Torah says could be having an other status or could be excluded from or prohibited some things. That worries me.
I do not know what the new USA under Drake will be. I have questions about foreign troops that are brought in as support for marshalls and the Civil Authority. You can not state they are just here to support. It is just a coup with foreign troops bringing in. I can not define it any other way. Also is not clear for me what this new USA as I call it will be. The pure form as in the constitution mentioned and or the declaration of independence, or that what some other documents out there state. All that is still not clear. It worries me that we have seen in our history a lot of so-called freed nations. They got a new dictatorship or military leadership and no democracy after all after been freed. That would be the ultimate coup.We think to be freed but get an other force that governs us and does not honour our free-will and unalienable rights again. There are on both sides enough things to talk about, express concerns and have discussion about. I see therefore for now still loose ends.
I think there is not much attention paid by Drake and Turner to the common goals they have. Yes, common goals. The differences and divisions seem to grow by the day as the fear and discredit campaign is going on. Let me say what I have heard from both sides and the way David Wilcock acted has not made me a happy person to see the “new”, let us say USA, be a free state with unalienable rights of people honoured. I express this all here as I am not affiliated and connected to both groups nor do I know David Wilcock in person.
I have my doubts about this whole story as it can go sour and nasty every minute. It seems we are forced if all will come to bear to choose between Turner or Drake. I hope it will not be the civil war all over between two factions.
I hope reason will come and will lead maybe to real Oneness and Freedom and not for those who already ruled out others. Oneness is not partial, but whole and including all. Let the new begin with all included. Take those words and reflect on it. It is your choice to make the right descision gentleman.
Love and Light,
(c) 2012 – Copyright of Lucas, all writings of Lucas maybe published, re-blogged and posted only in full without altering anything with the http://www.lucas2012Infos.wordpress.com blog mentioned in the article with name of the author Lucas.