( Lucas : The intended ‘Opt In’ option as an excuse to get more control over the internet by a opt-in solution for people to choose to censor themselves upfront at their internet providers. It is a good try to get more control after the ongoing child abuse and child porn cases and rings that get exposed and even get into the heart of UK politics. The best way to get two flies in one strike is great via the proposed restrictions. Get a proposal out that will give us even more info and will give people the need to get themselves exposed for looking for porn on the net or liking for example shows where people by their own stupidity hurt them selves as those shows are now broadly available, like American Funniets Homevideos , etc. This ‘opt-in’ thing is not harmless. It gives the government and providers insight in what people see or want to read or not and it gets registered even when you do yourself fill in the options yourself or not. It is not a nanny state but an unlawful data use. It is not about consent as it is forced consent. What was free to access and only if you had committed a crime not even an offence is now prosecuted up front. As your guilty or have a certain way of thinking or behaviour as you do watch of filled in the yes option. It is a build in a social opt-in trap. It is also upfront censorship. It is not optional it is in Cameron’s view to be mandatory. So you have no choice to use this. It is restricting your rights by forcing you to self censor. )
British PM David Cameron has announced that all UK households are to have their access blocked to online pornography unless they choose to ‘opt in’. By the end of next year, households will have to accept or decline an automatic porn filter.
In his new plans, Cameron unveiled a series of measures targeted at blocking public access to all forms of online porn. The PM has repeatedly told the British public that access to online pornography in family homes risks “corroding childhood.”
All 19 million homes of internet users will have to inform their Internet Service Providers (ISPs) if they want access to pornographic content online, according to the Guardian.
As a preliminary step, people who set up new broadband accounts or switch subscriptions will be told to make the choice by the end of this year, and those wanting access to online porn will have to disable the filters approximately a year early.
Andy Dawson @profanityswan Hey @David_Cameron – I’ve thought about it all for about a second & I’m certain that porn is probably the least of this country’s problems.
“In a really big step forward, all the ISPs have rewired their technology so that once your filters are installed, they will cover any device connected to your home internet account,” Cameron said, commenting that the one choice would be applicable to all devices in the home.
The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) is in the process of drawing up a blacklist of search terms deemed ‘horrific,’ and online searches are to be redirected to information about the new law instead of wielding search results.
“You have a duty to act on this — and it is a moral duty,” Cameron said speaking directly to search engines such as Yahoo, Google and Bing.
Search engines have been given until October to block illegal content with the government already looking at the legislative options to force action.
TWEET:
Kate Manning @KateMangina David Cameron isn’t banning porn completely at all. He’s just making it less accessible for younger people. WHY DO PEOPLE NOT LISTEN!
4:17 после полудня – 22 июля 2013
Cameron claims that the move will have a special focus on the protection of children, and aims to criminalize porn that features scenes of rape or sexual violence, under the banner of “extreme pornography.”
Changes in legislation would mean that the distribution of online videos involving such content would be restricted, with ‘extreme’ meaning those that would not receive licenses to be sold in UK sex shops.
“The first challenge is criminal: and that is the proliferation and accessibility of child abuse images on the internet. The second challenge is cultural: the fact that many children are viewing online pornography and other damaging material at a very young age and that the nature of that pornography is so extreme,” the PM stated.
“Although it’s been a crime to publish pornographic portrayals of rape for decades, existing legislation does not cover possession of this material,” Cameron said. While this is the case in England and Wales, Scotland already has laws in place.
Attempt to implement ‘laughable’ deterrentOperators had agreed to automatically install adult content filters on phone networks, according to the PM. Cameron noted that WiFi networks would not be able to avoid the measures.
The UK PM also attempted to tackle the subject of illegal file sharing platforms saying that experts from the CEOP are to be given further powers to enable them to examine secretive file sharing networks.
“From next year, we will also link up existing fragmented databases across all the police forces to produce a single secure database of illegal images of children which will help police in different parts of the country work together more effectively to close the net on pedophiles,” he said.
“It will also enable the industry to use the digital hash tags from the database to pro-actively scan for, block and take down these images wherever they occur.”
The program will not necessarily stay within the country’s borders. Cameron mentioned a secretive joint UK-US taskforce which he could not “go into detail about…because that would undermine its effectiveness.”
Simon Riley @that_taxi If Cameron really goes for this porn filter, then he ABSOLUTELY has to ban page 3 girls. But he won’t do that, cos Murdoch. #goit
Cameron insisted that he was acting as a father and a politician rather than a scaremonger. However, his declaration raised a number of questions among critics who question who would decide what constituted pornography, whether the continuation of the British Murdoch-owned national newspaper ‘The Sun’s’ Page 3 would be allowed to continue, and how the distribution of material through p2p and social networking platforms such as Twitter would be enforced.
“Let’s create a real deterrent, not a pop-up that pedophiles will laugh at,” Jim Gamble, a former deputy chief constable and chairman of CEOP told the Evening Standard.
“There are 50,000 predators we are told by CEOP downloading images from peer-to-peer, yet from Ceop intelligence only 192 were arrested last year,” he said. “That’s simply not good enough.”
Lucas 2012 Infos 